Every rubric placed.
Every certainty labelled.
Homoeologic+ reorganises all 64,262 Kent repertory rubrics into the nine pillars of the Triangle Method — and, for every one, tells you how much of that placement is objective fact and how much is interpretation.
A modern keyword / pathology overlay. Classical sources do not assign miasms rubric-by-rubric — so every classification carries an explicit confidence score.
One repertory, reorganised into nine pillars
Every rubric is read against nine lenses drawn from The Special Triangle Method for Selection of Simillimum and Kent’s own structure. Five are objective, three interpretive, one heuristic — and the system never pretends otherwise.
Not just a location — a fully scored piece of evidence
Behind each rubric sits a structured record: which pillar it belongs to, how much it should weigh, how sharply it separates remedies, and how good a question it makes.
We refuse to dress interpretation as fact
Three tiers of certainty run through every classification. You always know which one you are looking at.
Taken straight from Kent’s own wording and structure — “ailments from”, chapter, pathology term, thermal modality, laterality. These are facts about the repertory.
MIND rubrics mapped to essential nature, character type and temperament. Interpretive by nature, but bound to the source PDF’s own lexicon — never invented.
Rubric-level miasm is a modern keyword/pathology heuristic. It carries an explicit confidence score on every rubric and is presented as guidance, not doctrine.
“Classical sources do not assign miasms rubric-by-rubric. Every miasm classification therefore carries an explicit confidence score and should be read as guidance, not doctrine.”
Psora dominates — 9,424 of 12,365 miasm-tagged rubrics — exactly as the source predicts.
Built once, verified against printed Kent
The repertory, ready to reason with.
Open a consultation and let the nine pillars structure the case — while you keep every decision.
Clinical reasoning support for classical homoeopathy. A decision-support instrument — it structures evidence and surfaces questions; the prescribing physician always decides.